Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Dorothy Skrytek

Recent activity

Comments (30)

  • Comment on: Council and Veolia end contract over thwarted incinerator

    Dorothy Skrytek's comment 15 August, 2019 8:50 am

    What estimated 'saving'? Rubbish. Reduction, reuse, recycling and composting is ALWAYS cheaper for local authorities, than incineration. Incin contracts ALWAYS stipulate that recyclable and compostable materials ie 'calorific' and 'organic' are 'procured' for destruction, instead of the cheaper 3Rs (& composting) eg Derby/Derbyshire, Derby city council even admitted to DEFRA that recycling was cheaper than incineration! Councils now paying the cost of getting out of the high-carbon, wasteful, PWC/Deloitte et al contracts.
    Evidence, including contract extracts, on

  • Comment on: MPs warn food waste collections will cost ‘many millions’

    Dorothy Skrytek's comment 23 July, 2019 7:38 am

    It will cost the earth and future generations, not to collect it and turn it into compost. Burning it, as biomethane etc, is high-carbon & the residual left over from bio-m etc is not as good as compost made from unburned foodwaste/organics etc. Derby/Derbyshire shot themselves in the foot by signing a contract to destroy such 'waste' resources, ending up possibly having to pay millions, because of a financially insecure contract & company; recycling figures plummeted & costs increased -

  • Comment on: AD 'can cut UK greenhouse gas emissions by 5%'

    Dorothy Skrytek's comment 17 July, 2019 1:14 pm

    Its still a burning process, causing CO2 and misery to nearby local communities. In Derbyshire, there is a campaign against AD from a massive proposed piggery, with resulting air pollution, bisphenol contamination etc. especially if mixed with household/other waste. Compost made from foodwaste etc instead is of a much better quality, than the leftovers from AD

    Derby & S Derbys Friends of the Earth

  • Comment on: Large-scale EfW on the cards for Lancashire

    Dorothy Skrytek's comment 19 June, 2019 9:31 am

    Derby and Derbyshire councils made the same mistake and are bitterly regretting the Derbyshire high-carbon plastics/biomass/biowaste/resources incinerator and accompanying contract.

    Mass balance reveals more energy wasted, than the tiny amount created. They are purely for disposal and the contracts set up, destroy reduction, reuse, recycling and composting, as they rely on increasing tonnages of 'calorific' and 'organic' materials, for destruction. That's not residual waste, so they 'procure' the recyclables instead, destroying 3Rs.


    Should be renamed 'energy-to-waste'

  • Comment on: More waste went to EfW but no more energy produced

    Dorothy Skrytek's comment 12 June, 2019 9:49 am

    Mass balance of such high-carbon 'energy-to-waste' plants reveals more energy wasted, than the tiny amount created. Reduction, resue, recycling and composting also end, wherever they are built, as they need resources, purely to destroy eg Renewi in Derbyshire

View all comments