Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Council faces EfW fight costs

A dispute over a £60m waste incinerator near Shrewsbury could cost Shropshire Council about £500,000, according to the authority’s leader.  

Veolia’s planned energy-from-waste facility in Battlefield was given the green light on Tuesday.

This followed an appeal by the waste giant against the council’s decision in 2010 to reject the application.

Shropshire waste services manager Larry Wolfe, said: “Shropshire Council will part-fund the appeal, having given financial indemnity to Veolia for the costs reasonably incurred in pursuing the appeal in accordance with the terms of the waste contract.”

Council leader Keith Barrow (Con) told the BBC the costs could amount to “about £500,000”.   

Work on the new facility could start in early summer, if ministers give it final sign off.

But the project still faces considerable local opposition.

Shrewsbury Conservative MP Daniel Kawcynski reportedly said he was “almost shaking with anger” and planned to raise the issue in the House of Commons.

Veolia said the scheme would burn up to 90,000 tonnes of waste and generate enough electricity to power 10,000 homes.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • The 2 year has in fact save the counci between £6m & £8m. The landfill costs in the 2 years will be around £4.8m where as the incinerator uniatry charge was to be around £11m a year. Even after selling on spare capacity and other payments, not having the incinerator saves £3-4m a year.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.