Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Key bidders snub iESE framework

Serco and Kier are among key firms snubbing the opportunity to take part in a controversial waste framework contract.  

Both told MRW they would not be bidding for a place on the framework, designed to save councils £85m by pooling collective buying power.

It represents the latest blow for the project, set up by council support organisation  Improvement and Efficiency South East (iESE), after MRW revealed market concerns in January.

A Kier spokeswoman said: “We didn’t submit a bid on this occasion because this particular framework did not align with our current business strategy.”

A Serco spokesman said: “Serco did seriously consider the iESE framework contract. However, after assessing this opportunity against our bidding criteria, it was decided not to pursue the contract on this occasion.”

The ESA said it had expressed concerns to iESE about some aspects of its proposals and the deliverability of savings through the framework.

“ESA’s members are committed to providing the best possible value for money for their local authority customers and will continue to do so, whether through iESE’s framework or alternative procurement processes,” an ESA spokesman added.

IESE said it was unable to discuss potential suppliers for the waste framework at this stage.  

Alison Templeton, director of procurement, added: “We can say that when the final announcement is made, councils will have a great range of suppliers to choose from and the framework will provide an efficient way for councils to access a range of waste management services.

“iESE and its partners are reshaping the waste market and the framework is a key element of that. Further solutions are coming down the track and we are committed to providing a range of them that will benefit councils and help them save money while providing first class waste services to their residents.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • This is another opportunity for the larger companies to monopolise local authority contracts. Small regional waste companies have no chance to compete, even though more often than not, on a case by case basis, they will offer the best value for money, and may in fact already have the facilities that the larger companies do not have locally. These contracts are bad news for local tax payers, and again on a local basis are bad value for money.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.