Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Competing roles hinder definitions

Competing roles hinder definitions

Recovery and disposal definitions play competing roles in EU legislation but cannot do so effectively, according to a report by Okopol, the Institute of Environmental Strategies.

It states that defining recovery to determine whether waste circulates freely in the internal market is not the same as defining recovery in order to set targets.

Adding to this confusion is the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice. It has confirmed that substituting natural resources was the basis for determining whether an operation was recovery or not. But Okopol said this did not always reflect the complexity of waste management operations, which have both a disposal and a recovery component.

The report gives two options for improving definitions adding that focusing definitions on the nature of waste should be decreased.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.