Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

EA to consult on MRF charging scheme in mid-March

The Environment Agency (EA) is planning to consult on a charging regime for auditing MRFs in mid-March.

The introduction of fees will allow the EA to recover the costs of enforcing the MRF code of practice, set to come into force in October 2014.

The consultation is likely to be launched in a month, a spokesperson for the EA told MRW.

The EA will inspect MRFs that handle more than 1,000 tonnes of recyclate twice a year, with one announced and one unannounced visit, plus additional compliance checks if material quality is considered poor.

There are 167 such facilities across England and Wales, according to the final impact assessment of the MRF code published alongside regulations (file right).

Defra estimates that inspections will costs the EA around £1,800 per site per year, for a total of over £314,600 a year for all MRFs.

“This includes staff time for site visits, technical advice, planning and analysis of data, legal costs, administration costs, and financing costs,” Defra said.

The department added an inspection would require around three hours of “technical operator time”.

The costs will be passed on to businesses with the charging regime.

Following the implementation of the code of practice, Defra expects the MRF sector to incur total costs of £800,000 per year, including agencies’ fees, equipment, sampling and administration.

Related files

Readers' comments (1)

  • If two site audit visits cost as much as £1800 per year, surely any MRFs that pay in excess of that in subsistence charges should receive a rebate if they don't have many inspections. Given the level of subsistence fee uplift from high CCS scores there should easily be enough to fund the MRF audits.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.