Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

ESA: Cuts to EA harm waste crime enforcement and tax evasion

Cuts to the Environment Agency (EA) budget threaten its ability to fight waste crime, a leading resource management organisation has said.

The Environmental Services Association was responding to the EA’s Waste Crime Report that said a record number of illegal waste sites had been closed in 2012/13.

Barry Dennis, ESA director general, said the agency uncovered more than 800 new illegal sites every year, many of which had been in operation for more than 12 months.

“The ESA is concerned that every minute that such sites are in operation they will harm the environment, blight local communities and undercut responsible operators,” Dennis said.

“The report points out that illegal waste operators are diverting as much as £1bn per annum away from legitimate businesses and taxpayers.”

The ESA is particularly concerned about landfill tax evasion, which it estimates cost the Treasury £200m a year. Dennis called it “a scandal” and said it was due to “illegal operators deliberately misclassifying waste going to landfill to avoid paying the correct amount of landfill tax”.

“This figure is likely to increase until the Government clamps down on this practice,” he said.

MRW has reported that ESA chairman David Palmer-Jones had called for measures to counter cheats who pass off active waste as inert to undercut legitimate operators. He recommended stricter tests for assessing what is inert or active waste, and a landfill tax escalator for inert wasteof up to £50 per tonne.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Has anybody checked to see whether the correct amount of Landfill Tax is being paid to the Exchequer by the Tip Operators.Would it be easy to understate "Active Waste" and overstate "Inert Waste".

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.