Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Incentives pilots justified with 20% take up

The Local Government Association (LGA) is only expecting a small amount of councils to take up pay as you throw schemes as it sends out a letter to gauge council interest in the Government pilots. A proportion of negative responses will not be a surprise as MRWs upcoming State of the Nation report has found that only 21% of the 121 local authorities (LAs) polled would be prepared to implement them. However, LGA policy consultant Alice Roberts told MRW that she thought that interest from a fifth of councils was a good result and a big enough number to justify doing the pilots. Roberts added she would not be surprised if some councils did not want to participate: This kind of option should be a power for councils but we didnt expect every council would want to take it up.

As well as opinions on the incentive scheme, which is going through Parliament in the Climate Change Bill, the LGA asked for councils feedback on forming Joint Waste Authorities (JWA). Roberts explained that the letter was not an official call for councils to take part in pilot incentive schemes or JWA because that was something that the Government would do.

In the recent House of Lords reading of the Climate Change Bill, Lord Rooker refused to name  councils interested in the financial incentive scheme but said that there had been some informal discussions (February 1 2008,


Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.