Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Industry welcomes wood waste storage proposals

Representatives of the wood recycling industry have broadly welcomed Environment Agency (EA) proposals on the storage of combustible materials.

The EA is consulting on changes to awarding standard environmental permits after an “unacceptable number” of fires at permitted sites storing or treating waste.

The Wood Recycling Association (WRA) welcomed the requirement for sites accepting more than 5,000 tonnes of wood waste a year to have a bespoke permit, because this would include most operators within the same regulatory environment.

It also supported a requirement for sites to implement fire protection plans, although there is concern that the EA and not the fire and rescue services that will approve these plans.

WRA executive director Simon Dowson told MRW: “We have experienced a number of occasions where a plan that was acceptable to the service has been rejected by the EA”.

An EA spokesperson confirmed that the agency will be agreeing the plans and ensuring they are fully implemented, adding: “Where appropriate, we will discuss fire prevention plans with our partners through groups such as the local resilience forums.”

The EA also proposed a requirement that wood waste activities shall not be carried out within 200 metres of a workplace or dwelling. WRA members expressed concern over the potential impact on existing operators who are currently working within that distance when they apply to vary or renew their permits.

The EA said the restriction safeguarded local communities and would also bring the wood processing standard in line with other combustible wastes, where the requirement already exists.

Current rules prevent wood waste from being stored on site for more than three months. The EA consultation proposes to extend this rule to open-air waste transfer stations and MRFs. However the WRA is lobbying for the removal of this rule on waste wood “to allow operators handling waste wood to stockpile wood destined for energy during the summer – assuming adequate measures are in place to mitigate the possibility and effects of fire”.

Alastair Kerr, director general, Wood Panel Industries Federation told MRW: “Our members are reasonably comfortable with this guidance because it is risk-based and allows for various mitigation options. 

“The tonnage limit is quite small so I would expect that many wood recycling companies could get caught by this and as such I could see that it could be a particular burden on smaller companies or those with restricted sites (size and location).”

The EA spokesperson said the agency was working closely with wood recyclers and supporting those affected by the changes “as they consider their options and where appropriate to transition to a new way of working”.

Call for joint working protocol

Dowson said: “At a Recycling Waste Fires Seminar at the Houses of Parliament on 4 November there was talk of a ‘Memorandum of Understanding and Joint Working Protocol’ between the EA and the Chief Fire Officers Association.

“It is important that this Joint Working Protocol is in place before the new Standard Permit Rules are introduced to ensure a fair and consistent approach to fire management at waste sites across the whole country.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • When dealing with highly combustible materials, such as wood waste, a simple roof canopy can be an effective way of reducing risk and demonstrating compliance – as the EA suggests.

    Covering waste materials, gives some protection from airborne ignition sources – such as the famous Chinese lantern incident at a recycling plant in Smethwick in 2013 (http://ow.ly/I1ntP). Canopies also help control moisture levels and therefore, the risk of spontaneous combustion.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.