A Labour government would introduce a landfill ban on food waste, the shadow secretary for environment has said, reiterating the party’s commitment to the policy.
Speaking at the Labour party’s annual conference in Brighton on 22 September, Mary Creagh (left) said that an executive led by Ed Miliband would increase regulations on food, including imposing landfill restrictions on food waste.
“A One Nation Labour government will ban food from landfill so that less food gets wasted in the supermarket supply chain and more food gets eaten by hungry children,” she said.
Creagh had already proposed introducing such a ban at a food packaging conference in January this year. She also mentioned that a food consumption hierarchy would be established - with people at the top and anaerobic digestion at the bottom - to set out priorities in the food system.
But a waste policy review launched by Creagh and shadow waste minister Gavin Shuker in April lacked of any detail on landfill bans on specific materials. In an interview with MRW, Shuker said that his party was not backtracking from the proposal and maintained he was “very warm” about outlawing food waste from landfill.
Research conducted by the Green Alliance, an environmental think tank, has found that £2.5bn worth of food, textiles, wood, and plastics could be recovered if they were subjected to a landfill ban similar to the bans on cars and waste electronics.
Industry figures took to Twitter to express their scepticism of the policy, however:
Labour to ban food from landfill, need to understand practicalities it needs the coordination of infrastructure/logistics to be deliverable!
— David Palmer-Jones (@DPJ_SITAUK) September 23, 2013
@DPJ_SITAUK@christineottery uninformed soundbites. Unless they are planning to double the size of the EA?
— 360environmental (@360env) September 23, 2013
@360env @DPJ_SITAUK @christineottery yes not sure it has much relevance as landfill won’t be the main form of disposal in few years
— Meditative Dustman (@MeditativeDust) September 23, 2013
In her Labour conference speech, Creagh also railed against the coalition Government’s stance on environmental deregulation as a whole. She said: “If there’s one thing this Government enjoys, it’s getting rid of environmental regulations.”
“David Cameron’s drive to deregulate the food industry, coupled with his cost of living crisis created the perfect conditions for the horsemeat scandal,” she added.
You might also like...
Discarded food in UK households costs £12.5bn per year
Throwing away uneaten food costs the average UK family nearly £720 a year and the whole nation £12.5bn a year, a new study from WRAP has revealed.
News review of 2018
That was 2018 – the year when China’s ban on most waste material imports really showed how decisions in one country can affect those on the other side of the world, as the UK and others scrambled to find alternative capacity.
Labour appoints ‘first’ shadow waste and recycling minister
Ipswich MP Sandy Martin has been announced as Labour’s shadow waste and recycling minister.
Scottish Tories call for agricultural recycling fund
Scottish Conservatives have said they would redirect unspent money from the Circular Economy Investment Fund (CIEF) to support food producers and rural communities.
Labour warning over delay to plastic tax
The delay in implementation of the Budget’s plastic tax means 700,000 more tonnes of plastic packaging will be thrown away, according to the Labour Party.
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment
Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.
Readers' comments (1)
Phillip Ward25 September, 2013 11:28 am
Having provided the leadership in the sense of setting the goal, I hope the Labour Party will work closely with the waste industry and local authorities to work out the best way to make it happen - it has to involve ways to reduce arisings, collection infrastructure and reprocessing capacity with achievable deadlines.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment