Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

LARAC adds weight to call for collections guidance

Local authority recycling officers have supported industry calls for specific guidance on recycling collections to clarify what will be legally acceptable after the amended Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2012 come into force.

From 1 January 2015, waste collection authorities must collect waste paper, metal, plastic and glass separately, unless they can demonstrate it is not technically, environmentally and economically practicable (TEEP).

Former resource minister Lord de Mauley recently wrote to councils to explain what will be expected of them on terms of separate and commingled collections.

In response, Joy Blizzard, chair of the Local Authority Recycling Advisory Committee (LARAC), said: “The letter has had a sobering effect, reminding councils of their obligations, and that in all probability a considerable amount of legal disputation might result from a local authority’s choice of recycling system.”

However, she added that local authoroties “desperately needed” TEEP guidance as soon as possible.

Blizzard said that local authorities relying on Materials Recycling Facilities (MRFs) also needed assurance that the facilities will be able to produce high enough quality recyclate.

She said: “a lot of heat and not much light has come from some rather entrenched views across the recycling chain, but I would like to see some of that energy and innovation going into solving a larger issue - which is ensuring that recycling schemes continue to deliver material fit for reprocessing, green jobs and play their part in reducing climate change.”

The Resource Association, Chartered Institution of Wastes Management and the Environmental Services Association have all made calls for early TEEP guidance to help councils avoid legal challenges.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Bernard Chase

    It occurs to me that it should be the customer, being the next recipient in the supply chain, who should be the one to decide whether material that is being collected is fit for reprocessing or not.
    For too long local authorities and their chosen contractors have been happy to sit back and say to reprocessors "what you see is what you get". Perhaps now they will have to do a little work for a change.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.