Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Outdoor waste storage branded a fire risk

Industry experts are divided over whether more indoor storage of waste would cut the number of fires at recycling plants.

Up to 20 tonnes of material was lost in a fire at a recycling depot in Sheffield, days after blazes at a Jayplas facility in the West Midlands and a Sweeep site in Kent. All three fires appeared to involve waste stored in the open air.

MRW has reported that fire chiefs and environment officials were investigating whether tighter controls were needed to prevent fires in the recycling industry.

“The evidence seems to suggest that external storage of inflammable material, in particular plastics, paper and textile, in large amount, represents a risk,” Keith Freegard, director at consultancy Axion Recycling, told MRW this week.

“The material is open to deliberate local vandalism, like arson, or careless use of lighted items. This makes outside storage, especially in dry periods, very susceptible to fires.”

Safety considerations, along with increasing difficulties in obtaining insurance coverage for large scale external waste storage, could drive a shift towards more indoor storage, he added.

However, John Glover, managing director at Bywaters, said indoor storage was expensive, not only because it required large buildings, but because enclosed facilities incur into higher taxation in the form of business rates.

“A company’s exposure to business rates may jump 10 times for a covered site, even though covering produces no additional income,” he told MRW.

He argued that if business rates on buildings used for recycling activities were lowered, the vast majority of companies would have enclosed storage facilities within five years.

Freegard instead called for the government to promote safety by offering capital support or tax incentives for business expenditure on fire systems.

Steve Lee, chief executive at the Chartered Institution of Wastes Management, told MRW: “There is no ideal solution, because both inside and outside storage poses benefits and problems.

“Top quality site management is, however, clearly becoming increasingly important. As an industry we must develop and share best practice, and we are keen to work with stakeholders and regulators to tackle this issue.”

Phil Conran, director at consultancy 360environmental, said sites that store waste inside were not immune to large fires.

Fire risk increases when facilities’ capacities are stretched, he told MRW, noting that the Environment Agency’s permitting regime restricts sites’ throughput rather than their storage levels.

“With market issues such as this year’s Green Fence import crackdown in China, and the commodities crisis we saw in 2008, being unplannable, often sites contain far more waste than originally intended although still within their permit allowance,” he said.

Glover and Freegard both suggested that semi-covered storage could be the best solution for many firms, with roofed structures fitted with sprinklers to contain fires and incur lower business rates than full buildings.

Readers' comments (1)

  • From John Glover - MD - Bywaters. For any covered structure "sprinklers" need to be mandatory, whether the structure is fully enclosed or is just a roof with open sides. Ideally input, operational and output buildings would be separated by firewalls. Even if a fire is rapidly extinguished it is highly likely the building and its contents will be damaged by smoke and water. Once a fire has taken place you will find you are under-insured and insurers may even walk away from a claim. Fires within buildings can be totally unpredictable, whatever precautions you take. If fire is a serious risk ensure 365/24 on-site staff attendance. Automatic alarms may be thought to be a false alarm and valuable minutes lost. John Glover, newly trained fire expert! There is no final "right" answer to resolve this issue.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.