Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Sellafield faces legal action over waste disposal

Sellafield is facing prosecution after being accused of disposing of hazardous waste at a landfill site.

The Environment Agency (EA) and Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) alleges that the company, which manages the nuclear site in West Cumbria, sent four bags of low-level radioactive waste to Lillyhall landfill site, in nearby Workington, Cumbria, in 2010.

The company faces nine charges under the Radioactive Substances Act and Environmental Permitting Regulations, as well as the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2009. The charges follow a two-year investigation by the EA and ONR.

At the time, Sellafield said that the 30kg of waste was taken to Lillyhall instead of the low-level waste repository near Drigg because a bag monitoring machine incorrectly categorised them as not being radioactive.

The case will go to Workington Magistrates Court next month, and Sellafield said that it was therefore unable to comment.

The legal action comes in the wake a report from the National Audit Office earlier this month, which highlighted the “considerable challenge” faced by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority in the clean-up of Sellafield, the UK’s largest and ‘most hazardous’ nuclear site. The office said the cost of storing radioactive material at Sellafield had risen by more than £900m in 10 months.

Sellafield said it welcomed the report’s recognition of the challenge it faced in decommissioning the site, and said that it had taken steps to “strengthen its approach”.

Readers' comments (1)

  • 30 kg of waste! What a totally disproportionate reaction. This will end up in hundreds of thousands in legal costs - how can that be in the public interest?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.