Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

St Regis takes effluent case to Court of Appeal

St Regis has decided to appeal against its conviction of misleading the Environment Agency (EA) and falsifying records following high effluent quality results from its Higher Kings Mill, Cullompton.

The case was due to be heard for sentencing on 16 April after the EA decided to make a Proceeds of Crime Application. Because St Regis has taken the case to the Court of Appeal, sentencing has now been pushed back

An EA spokesperson said: “No new date has been set yet, as the case cannot continue while St Regis seeks to appeal the decision.”

St Regis was found guilty in October last year at Exeter Crown Court of misleading the EA when records showed effluent quality was close to its permitted levels. When an EA officer asked to see the company’s daily environmental record sheets he noticed one had been altered from a value in excess of the daily limit (100mg/l) to just under the permitted amount (60mg/l).

Technical manager Christopher Steer was found guilty of manipulating recordings of the quality of effluent to make them look better than they were.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.