Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Target beating paper rates exclude export tonnages

Levels of waste paper packaging recovery could be even higher than figures that show Government targets have already been smashed, according to the Confederation of Paper Industries (CPI).

Data from the National Packaging Waste Database (NPWD) showed that in 2007 the UK achieved a recovery rate of 84% against a target of 67%, in terms of UK obligated business performance. While projections suggest that if current levels of recovery continue into 2008, rates could be 78%, which would beat targets of 60%.

But rates could be even higher than this. Other CPI data sources suggested that significant tonnages of material are being exported outside the regulatory framework, which does not count towards Government figures.

CPI recovered paper sector manager Peter Seggie said: It is highly likely that the actual recovery level for paper packaging waste against what the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs believes to be flowing into the UK waste stream is much higher than is suggested from the NPWD data.

According to Seggie, the market led UK packaging regulatory system will always mean when targets are reached, the value within the financial mechanism (the PRN and PERN) will fall to a nominal level. He said this is what is now being seen for paper. He also said that this is most likely to be what is causing exporters to send material for reprocessing outside the regulatory system.

Seggie added: 2007 was another bumper year for paper packaging recovery and this is being driven by global demand rather than the regulatory framework. The PRN/PERN value for paper packaging is just about covering the administrative costs of UK reprocessors and exporters but is not leading to any further investment decision being made on the back of it.

Similar concerns about the benefits of the PRN/PERN system to industry growth were raised earlier this year by the CPI (February 13 2008,


Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.