Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Three planned incinerators called into question

Three planned energy from waste (EfW) incinerators are to be reviewed pending decisions on whether they will go ahead at all, pointing towards a shift away from incineration as a method of waste treatment.

It is believed that spiralling costs and a dramatic reduction in residual waste arisings have put a question mark over the plans to build EfW facilities in Hull, Coventry and Leeds.

Senior councillors from Hull City Council and East Riding Council are meeting to discuss the matter with one option being a much smaller waste-burner than the 240,000 tonne facility which is currently planned.

Elsewhere in Coventry, a now Labour-run city council, following the local elections, there is concern about funding a joint project between the city council, Solihull Borough Council and Warwickshire County Council to rebuild an incinerator in Whitney.  

The council has said it is reluctant to put money into the PFI for the incinerator at the expense of frontline services and is instead now considering a plan to merely improve the existing facility rather than rebuild it.

Similarly, in Leeds a new Labour administration is to throw out the previous Lib-Con council’s plan to expand incineration as the principle way of dealing with the city’s waste.

The news that the validity of all of these projects is now being questioned has been welcomed by anti-incineration activists who believe this may be the start of an emerging trend away from building incinerators on account of financial issues.

UK Without Incineration (UKWIN) national coordinator Shlomo Dowen told MRW: “This can now be considered a pattern and it must be said that there is definitely a connection between this trend emerging and the outcome of the recent general and local elections.

“The changes in terms of both the government and the economy mean that these proposals will be looked at more carefully and authorities will start to consider more and more whether they are economically viable. You have got to remember the Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats are notoriously anti-PFI so this will obviously have an impact on a lot of proposed facilities.”

Readers' comments (2)

  • One real problem about building incinerators to burn our waste is the total lack of transparency involved. Our joint councils, (Hull City,, and East Riding of Yorkshire), simply ignored the existing Joint Waste Local Plan, (which states that incineration shall only be used if it can be proven to be superior to all other treatments),. They signed an incinerator contract with WRG. and are in a financial mess. The councils have no money. WRG cannot deliver. Who can have any sympathy with such stupidity?
    Barry Robinson

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Siarhei Druhakou

    Incineration should be left in the PAST. Today it possible to treat waste with more efficient way and using more efficient technology with no pollution. If that councils looking for solving the problem with waste, they could ask me or some other experts, but not just one big company who want to receive money and they don`t care what will happened after that - they got their revenue. Different technologies should be considered very carefully and not just implementing first available.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.