Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

UK to have multiple compliance schemes for batteries

The Government has opted for a multiple producer compliance scheme system over a single scheme to ensure the UK meets the requirements of the Batteries Directive.

In a response to a December 2007 consultation on the Batteries Directive, the Department for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform (BERR) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) summarised plans for the Directive, which is due to come into force on September 26.

The Batteries Directive works in similar way to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive and it requires producers of batteries to take responsibility for the collection, treatment and recycling of waste batteries. Producer compliance schemes take responsibility off producers and carry out their responsibilities for them.

The Government acknowledges that a single scheme system would cover a whole territory and make it easier for producers to join and keep costs at a fixed price. The Waste & Resources Action Programme and the Local Government Association favoured such a scheme in their response. But the Government said that a multiple scheme would provide more flexibility for producers, giving them an element of choice and potentially resulting in their incurring lower costs.

Under the European Union Batteries Directive the UK must collect 25% of waste portable batteries by 2012, even though it currently collects only 3%. In the UK no producer responsibility scheme offers a single scheme system - they all offer a multiple ones.

However, in choosing a multiple scheme the Government is aware of the risks of that approach and has cited the WEEE system as an example of problems over evidence trading costs. It said that it had to ensure that trading of evidence is limited and not used as the primary means of discharging obligations and ensure that compliance schemes provide coverage to the whole territory of the UK, as necessary.

The Government has also acknowledged that the new regulations are unlikely to be fully introduced until the start of next year, even though they had been scheduled to be transposed into UK law in September.

Image: Batteries

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.