Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Waste has 'more potential for jobs and green growth' than wind power

The Government needs to focus more on investment in waste infrastructure over other high-profile green sectors, the Environmental Services Association (ESA) has warned.

The Association’s Green Growth: Don’t Waste the Opportunity report estimates that a £1bn investment in waste infrastructure would provide 3,000 jobs and a four million-tonne reduction in carbon emissions relative to the same investment in wind power, which would generate only 650 jobs and save 1.4 million tonnes of carbon.

The report estimated that £1bn spent on a modern mix of waste infrastructure could save £13bn in landfill costs for businesses and households and add £2bn to UK GDP.

ESA director of policy Matthew Farrow said: “Pound for pound, investment in waste infrastructure creates more jobs and saves more carbon emissions than investment in wind farms. The waste review must show the Government recognises the potential of the sector to deliver real green growth.

“The Government has been overly focused on high-profile green sectors such as wind power and electric vehicles. Important as these may be, with the economy stumbling and having just adopted very tough carbon budgets, the Government is missing a trick if it does not act to realise the potential of the waste management sector.”

Readers' comments (2)

  • It is worth mentioning that the ESA "represents the UK's waste management and secondary resources industry" - so they would say that, wouldn't they?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • BTW, I've not yet managed to locate the ESA report on the Internet - so I've not been able to assess the ESA's claims, or to understand their assumptions - especially regarding the content of their basket of waste management methods...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.