Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

A willing public let down by lack of cash

Corin Williams

I had a chat the other day with a very well-informed shop owner about his fears that his carefully separated recycling was all being dumped into one container and sent to landfill. I assured him this was unlikely, but that councils sometimes were forced to divert material to incineration.

The ongoing drama between unions and Birmingham City Council, for instance, has at times lead to a backlog of material that needs to be shifted pronto because it’s got nowhere else to go.

The shop owner was also well-versed in waste shipments to China. This conversation shows the extent to which the general public is getting involved with the resources debate – unsurprising given the amount of coverage in papers and on primetime TV.

It is clear the effective management of the UK’s waste needs the willing co-operation of the public. But there are signs this is not happening, with the percentage of target material received by MRFs having decreased by 0.6% since the previous quarter. Local authorities are collecting ever-more contaminated recycling from householders.

There will be many reasons for this, but a key concern has to be a lack of local government resources to get residents on-board with the system.

Peter Jones, principal consultant at Eunomia, said councils were struggling to get on top of the problem of contamination: “It’s a real challenge, but one where targeted communication with householders can make a significant difference and produce savings.”

Whatever the impact of Defra’s consultation on harmonising household collections, if councils don’t get extra funds for recycling services, the situation won’t improve.

Readers' comments (1)

  • It is unfortunate that within local authorities, services such as recycling education and communication is an intangible and therefore one of the few areas in waste and resources services that can be reduced. All too often there is a direct correlation between the standards,quality and quantity of the public recycling,quantities of residual waste and the spend on effective communication and education about recycling and waste reduction/prevention It is also difficult for both officers and councillors to justify such expenditure against equally pressing concerns about Adult and Children's services. In my view the only way to address this would be via a dedicated or ring-fenced government fund for local authorities to access.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.