Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cory’s energy sell-off proves valuable

2000 cory riverside

In June we saw the much-anticipated announcement of the sale of Cory Riv­erside Energy by SVPGlobal and the other shareholders for a colossal £1.5bn. It has been a text-book exam­ple by the exiting shareholders on how to maximise value – ultimately recog­nising that the individual parts of the company were worth far more than the whole.

The acquiring consortium was led by Dalmore Capital, a London-based infrastructure investor which manages £3.8bn of funds, and included Fiera Infrastructure, Semperian and Swiss Life. This is the first energy-from-waste (EfW) investment for any of them.

It is worth looking back at how the process evolved to deliver such a great outcome for the shareholders.

The aborted process (2015)

In 2007, Eiser Infrastructure, Santander and Finpro acquired Cory for £588m from private equity firm Montagu, in a highly leveraged buyout. In early 2015, the heavily indebted Viking, which included Cory Environmental and the Riverside EfW plant, was put up for sale to realise an exit for these shareholders.

Unfortunately, the target equity value of around £500m never materialised and it became clear that the other divi­sions within Cory – landfill, municipal and brokerage – were a drag on the overall value of the Riverside ‘jewel in the crown’. Riverside is one of the UK’s largest EfW facilities, has an R1 efficiency certification and is considered to be best in class. It also delivered almost 70% of the group’s EBITDA.

Offers for the business peaked at around 7.5x EBITDA, much lower than the Dutch AVR acquisition, which was sold to Cheung Kong Group for 9.1x EBITDA. German company EEW was also known to be in process and expect­ing a valuation around 10x.

With the sale not happening, the debt holders SVP, EQT Credit and Commerzbank forced a debt-for-equity swap and assumed total control from Eiser and the others. This reduced Cory’s debt from £790m to £410m and maturities were pushed back to December 2019, effectively giving the business a three-year window in which to execute a more successful exit.

The non-core sell off (2016 and 2017)

Nick Pollard joined the team as chief executive from Balfour Beatty at the end of 2015 and set about selling the non-Riverside assets.

During 12 months, Cory sold three non-core divisions. The municipal business based in the south-west was sold to Biffa in June 2016. A month later, the brokerage business was acquired by Bregal Capital-backed Reconomy and, in January 2017, the landfill operation, which included 14 landfill sites, was sold to Armour, a Bermudan-based insurance and rein­surance provider.

Importantly, this decoupled any potential landfill liabilities from a future sale of Riverside, the level of which attracted much debate in 2015.

With the non-core gone, Cory then rebranded as Cory Riverside Energy and revealed plans to build a second large EfW facility (650,000 tonnes a year) adjacent to the existing site in Bel­vedere, Kent, and provide prospective buyers significant expansion opportu­nity. It was expected that this new £500m plant would be factored into the buying price.

The perfect exit (2018)

In October 2017, the shareholders (60% now owned by SVP) appointed JPMorgan to sell the business. The process was competitive, attracting a wide range of investors – from strategic players such as Beijing Enterprises and China Everbright to institutional investors including Amber Infrastruc­ture, Arcus Infrastructure, Equitix and Dalmore Capital.

But Chinese interest waned and the infrastructure funds were now making all the running.

It was confirmed in June that Dal­more and its consortium was the suc­cessful bidder, paying around £1.5bn of enterprise value. By any measure, the shareholders can feel they have exe­cuted a patient and perfectly managed process, which has ultimately delivered a great outcome.

comparison

comparison

Contrasting the metrics of this deal for Riverside against AVR and EEW, illustrated by the chart (above), under­scores the value that the new investors have placed on this asset: highly strate­gic location in a global metropolitan city, favourable market dynamics, a high-quality plant and operations, and the opportunity to almost double capac­ity in the next five years.

While it would be easy to read this deal across to the wider EfW market, our assessment is that the sale of Cory Riverside was unique and not easily applicable to wider market valuations – even given the substantial market opportunity for EfW to address the con­tinuing, and mountainous, residual waste capacity gap in the UK.

Mark Wilson is Partner corporate finance at Alantra

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.