At the time of writing, publication of the resources and waste strategy is imminent and expectations are high. It is a rare opportunity for ministers to shape a ‘whole system’ approach that will deliver Defra’s 25-year plan, the EU’s circular economy (CE) package and the aspiration for the UK to be recognised as a champion of sustainability.
But the current producer responsibility system must be overhauled if the UK is to achieve future recycling targets and move towards a truly circular economy.
Data shows that 92% of the aluminium packaging collected for recycling in the UK is recycled within Europe. This shows that there is more than enough capacity within the EU to recycle the aluminium packaging recovered for recycling in the UK. Indeed, today there is more than enough capacity to recycle all the aluminium packaging sold within the UK.
One of the key CE package’s extended producer responsibility (EPR) requirements is for the packaging supply chain to cover a minimum of 85% of the cost of collecting packaging materials for recycling.
Aluminium is one of the few materials whose value more than covers the cost of collection and sorting, so we are committed to ensure this is recognised in the new EPR system. Good quality collection data will be essential to ensure that the requirements can be delivered in a fair and equitable way for producers and local authorities.
Alupro recently commissioned an independent review into the quality of data provided by local authorities. It highlighted that data from WasteDataFlow and the sampling procedures outlined in the MRF Code of Conduct, used by the Environment Agency and WRAP, is not necessarily sufficient for observing changes in individual material streams.
While the research enabled us to recommend the sampling size/frequency required to monitor the impact of campaigns, councils will face financial barriers when trying to deliver this level of data because of the additional sampling required beyond the standards of the MRF Code.
The inconsistencies in and quality of data reporting are a real concern which will need to be addressed if producers are expected to cover the costs of collection. Producers will need to know that their money is delivering increases in recycling and improving quality.
We are not convinced that the current sampling and reporting regimes will be able to deliver the quality of data that is reasonably expected.
Rick Hindley is executive director at Alupro
You might also like...
Auditors raise alarm over packaging fraud
Parliament’s spending watchdog has criticised Defra for measuring packaging recycling in ways that fail to account for fraud.
Packaging reforms could 'turbo-boost' recycling
Industry body the Industry Council for Packaging and the Environment (Incpen) said Defra’s consultations on the resources and waste strategy offer the chance to “turbo-boost the nation’s recycling performance”.
Sustainability 'must be at heart of economic model' says Hammond
Chancellor Phillip Hammond in his spring statement has pledged to “build sustainability into the heart of our economic model”, and argued that “there is an economic as well as an environmental case for protecting the diversity of the natural world”.
Plastics firms 'forced to take urgent action' on waste
Voluntary sustainability agreements and the increasing interest in ‘chemical recycling’ as part of a circular economy have been major themes at PlasticsEurope’s annual IdentiPlast event in London.
Have your say
You must sign in to make a comment
Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.