Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Incinerator emissions are tight enough

Keith Riley

It is always tempting when someone does not do what you want them to do to dismiss them as being unreasonable extremists. I believe the energy- from-waste (EfW) sector must never do that, so I do not subscribe to environmentalists being ignored.

After all, we are all environmentalists – its just that some of us come at it from a different perspective. These ‘environmental lobbyists’, as I will call them, are our consciences and without them we would have unclean air and a poisoned environment all over the world.

But to live the lifestyle we want, there are practical issues that must be addressed, and waste is one of them.

“To live the lifestyle we want, there are practical issues that must be addressed, and waste is one of them.”

Lobbyists want to make the rules on incinerator emissions much more stringent than at present. The industry, I think, accepts that the technology is now in such a position that a tightening of the limits can be sustained. But it needs to have a set of rules it can meet at an acceptable economic cost.

So there needs to be a tradeoff between having very low emissions but very expensive waste management with having higher emissions but at a lower cost.

At no time has the sector wanted more relaxed emission limits than are currently in place, but it has sought a level that can be afforded without impacting human health.

EfW is a safe technology and the emission levels are stringent. While it would be better to recycle everything, the world is not yet in a position to do that.

Keith Riley is Partner at consultancy EnergyGap

Readers' comments (1)

  • As incineration plants need to burn reducible, reusable and recyclable [plastics, creating nitrogen dioxide and dioxins, there is a reason for more stringent emission control. This control is simply this. Stop building them. There is no 'emission control' for dioxin. Under the Persistent Organic POllutants Treaty, the UK is supposed to be reducing the creation of dioxins, not increasing it. 

    Shanks/Resource Recovery Solutions, admitted at the Derby/Derbysjhire incineration plant inquiry, that Continuous Emiisions Monitoring Systems could be switched off. No-one would know about this, even the Environment Agency
    For previous, see

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.