Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Way to make WEEE recycling fair for all

Dr Philip Morton

The revised regulations on WEEE in 2013 heralded two main changes which have continued to influence mar­ket behaviour and, I believe, is the best intervention to stabilise the market.

First of all, the regulations intro­duced a compliance fee – which is essentially a safety valve in the UK WEEE system and moves it away from a closed ‘must buy’ market to a more competitive free market where pro­ducer compliance schemes (PCSs) are given tonnage targets in advance.

This means that, in any year, there could be too much or too little WEEE collected depending on the target set­ting accuracy and consumer behaviour.

It is crucial to have a fee that achieves Defra’s policy goals and ensures that schemes can still comply if, for any reason, they do not have sufficient WEEE. But the fee needs to be set at the ‘Goldilocks’ level – not too high, not too low, but just right – for prevailing mar­ket conditions in any given year.

If it is too high, market prices for WEEE treatment or evidence could rise simply on sentiment. If too low, then PCSs could choose to under-collect and pay a fee, leading to a surplus in the market and the possibility of unaligned council-run designated collection facilities (DCFs).

Fortunately, the second change to the regulations prevents there being unaligned local authority DCFs: sites left without a contracted PCS can ex-ercise their right for free uplift under Regulation 34. But this regulation is less than ideal, hence the launch of the producer compliance scheme balancing system (PBS) (see box).

Regulation 34 is a backstop to be used where a council DCF cannot find a willing PCS partner. The law allows such a site, when out of contract, to con­tact any PCS and request a free collec­tion. The PCS must collect even if it already has enough WEEE.

While this seems to be the fairest option on the surface, in reality, Regula­tion 34 is a headache for local authority sites and PCSs alike.

For local authorities, the regulation is retrospective, meaning that a site can ask for a collection only once the WEEE is ready to collect and it only applies to individual collections. This restriction requires the site manager to reach out to a PCS every time a container is full.

While sites can ask the same PCS or a different scheme each time, it can also insist the scheme it previously partnered with to continue. Neither is ideal and all options waste valuable time, adding disruption and costs into the system.

From a PCS’s point of view, enforcing Regulation 34 has the potential effect of being costly – and may even cause a scheme to go bust if a large or several large councils insist it collects their WEEE. Most PCSs have joined the PBS to help the system function properly and it coincidentally provides a kind of insurance policy. It seems odd that not all PCSs are members – perhaps it is just a matter of time before everyone sup­ports it.

compliance fee weee is recycled

compliance fee weee is recycled

So what is the solution? The newly created PBS ensures that all surplus WEEE held at DCFs can be centrally managed via a ‘black box’. Participating schemes are required to bid for a collec­tion, with the best winning. The sys­tem’s independent administrator then ensures costs are shared out confiden­tially, depending on market share per stream, between all participating PCSs.

What this new system will do is take away the immediate danger currently faced by all PCSs: the risk of being inun­dated with WEEE they do not need while, at the same time, supporting those council sites without a contracted WEEE collection partner.

The PBS can provide continuity of service, one point of contact and cer­tainty that what councils have at their DCFs will be collected and properly recycled in a managed, professional manner.

The new system is open to all PCSs to join, and the service operates like a normal local authority/PCS contracted collection covering several months. Importantly, it is set up in advance and not operated retrospectively.

Producer Balancing System

The benefits

  • All approved PCSs are eligible to join and bid for the collection – the best bid wins and is treated in confidence
  • Service would be like a normal local authority/PCS contracted collection covering six months or to the end of the compliance year, whichever is the longer, and is set up in advance not in retrospect
  • Cost is then shared out, confidentially, based on PCS market share
  • Reduced risk of participating schemes being inundated with WEEE they do not need; risk remains for non-PBS members
  • Provides continuity of service and certainty for local authorities
  • Visible option for all parties

Philip Morton retired this month as Repic chief executive



Readers' comments (1)

  • Regulation 34 and the PBS system

    IMO This system can only work if the DCFs have their own container solution for each WEEE Cat/stream.

    Where a DCF is not aligned with a PCS how does it store its WEEE? As most PCS at the same time as contracting with a Council set up WEEE service providers which provide the containers as part of the agreement. When the PCS is no longer in contract/aligned with a Council the PCS's service providers remove their containers leaving the sites with no containers to store their WEEE in (could this breach the WEEE Directive/Regulations by not allowing private householders to deposit their WEEE free of charge because there is no container to deposit it into? Are the producers/PCS's in breach of the WEEE Directive/Regulations by not providing a free means of collection?).
    Does the Council then purchase their own containers at the expense of the public in order to facilitate the free deposition of WEEE from private households?

    It would be good to hear some feedback on how it is now managed in these circumstances.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.