Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Abbey stops Amey EfW project

Plans from Amey to build a £200m energy-from-waste (EfW) facility in Cambridgeshire has been halted by the nearby presence of a 12th century abbey.

Cambridgeshire County Council’s planning committee took the unusual step of rejecting the application despite a recommendation from council planners to accept it.

Amey had applied to build the £200m facility at Waterbeach Waste Management Park, where there are already a number of operations.

The 165ha site is allocated in council plans for waste industry use, including EfW. Amey had proposed to treat up to 250,000 tonnes a year of residual waste to create 27.4MW of electricity from a plant that required an 80m high chimney.

But objectors said this would ruin the setting of Denny Abbey, parts of which date to the 12th century.

South Cambridgeshire District Council said in its objection: “The Denny Abbey heritage site is exceptional and its significance multifaceted, but its setting is a fundamental contributor to that significance, including that of each listed building.

“The sheer size of the EfW facility, and its proximity and harm to the setting and views of Denny Abbey, would be contrary to [planning policy]”.

The Environment Agency said it would object to the project unless planning conditions were imposed to overcome “an unacceptable risk to the water environment”.

East Cambridgeshire District Council, Historic England, the Campaign to Protect Rural England and local Conservative MP Heidi Allen were also among objectors.

The planners’ report admitted that Amey’s project would cause detriment to Denny Abbey, but added: “We consider that there is a balanced planning justification to support the development of the EfW facility (and the carrying out of the associated works) as proposed in this application.”

Cambridgeshire’s formal decision notice said the project had been rejected due to “the harm to the setting of the Denny Abbey complex heritage asset” and its “scale and massing…in relation to the landscape…and harm to the visual amenity of local residents”.

A council spokesperson said: “The planning committee made a decision based on the facts from the officer report and information that arose through considering representations as part of the meeting, which included the landscape report funded by the local community.”

Rejection of an application recommended by officers is rare because this factor can count against councils in any planning appeal.

An Amey statement said: “Building the EfW facility at Waterbeach Waste Management Park is a sustainable solution for dealing with present and future waste needs in Cambridgeshire and the region, providing an opportunity to increase recycling, generate renewable electricity, create jobs and bring investment to the area.

“We will now take time to consider our next steps following yesterday’s decision.”

 

Readers' comments (3)

  • East Cambridgeshire District Council, Historic England, the Campaign to Protect Rural England, local Conservative MP Heidi Allen and Amey should consider another proven technology that does not require a chimney as no carbon waste is burnt, only the chemistry of the carbon, oxygen and water is managed in a carbon reactor so creating very high temperatures and all emissions can be avoided or captured for use. Worth thinking about?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Burning plastics is not 'renewable energy' & creates dioxin which the UK is pledged to educe the creation of, not increase it.
    tinyurl.com/lenelgd 

    Burning plastics etc creates carbon dioxide. There is no getting away from it Ditto the Climate Act etc
    https://www.foe.co.uk/groups/derby/727

    Incineration is more expensive than recycling.
    https://www.foe.co.uk/groups/derby/news/derby-city-derbyshire-county-council-DEFRA-PFI-bid-reveals-recycling-cheaper-than-incineration
    Incineration interferes with recycling
    tinyurl.com/opzh8ux
    Incineration causes Deaths Brought Forward
    foe.co.uk/groups/derby/news/Human-Rights-Deaths-Brought-Forward-Causing-Waste-of-Energy-Incineration-

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Neither Hugh, nor Dorothy, are providing solutions. Can they provide solutions that they would back with their own houses? True cooperation to provide solutions moves the world forward three times faster. Endless pulling in every direction often leads to inappropriate long term decisions just because a timely decision has to be made. By the time it comes to pass, good or bad, all the politicians will have moved on so there is no-one to take responsibility. Let’s work together.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.