Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Anti-incinerator group seeks crowd funding

A protest group has launched an attempt to crowd fund the cost of resisting a proposed incinerator near Horsham, West Sussex.

Last June, West Sussex County Council overturned an officer’s recommendation and rejected an application by Britaniacrest to build the facility.

The company has now appealed to the Planning Inspectorate, and the group, No Incinerator 4 Horsham (NI4H), wants to raise funds to be legally represented at its hearings.

NI4H said it needed to raise £50,000 for legal advice and consultancy.

According to the group, although Britaniacrest has reduced the plant’s height from 52.4m to 35.9m on its new plan, there would still be a visually intrusive chimney of 95m and noise pollution from the plant, which could handle 230,000 tonnes a year of waste.

It said: “There will be pollution from toxins, light and noise. Local residents fear for the health of their children and grandchildren as invisible toxins cloud the air. They are concerned that the visual impact of this huge building will blight the landscape, destroying the character of Horsham and surrounding historic villages.”

Britaniacrest director Chris Foss said: “All energy-from-waste facilities in the UK are strictly regulated to protect local communities and the environment. EfW is widely recognised as a safe, proven alternative to landfill which is the least sustainable option as it produces methane, an aggressive greenhouse gas, as the waste decomposes.

“We know this new facility is urgently needed to treat the waste that remains after recycling and composting processes have taken place.”

He said most the waste used would be sourced from within a 40-mile radius of the site. Significantly, and 90% of residual waste in the area would be diverted from landfill.

 

This story was updated on 4 February to include a statement supplied by Britaniacrest

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.