Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Augean looks for support in tax battle with HMRC

Augean says it will seek support from the wider waste industry if a dispute over landfill tax assessment with Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs escalates.



The specialist waste management firm has reported a bill from HMRC for £1.9m with £0.2m interest covering three months in 2013. The disagreement is about whether sufficient tax was paid for the treatment and disposal of hazardous waste.

The company says it will “robustly challenge” the HMRC assessment.

The statement said: “Based on the legal and other advice received by the group over several years, Augean is very confident that the group has met its obligations in respect of landfill tax, consistent with the law and official guidance at the time.”

Augean says the assessment was issued by HMRC to protect itself against falling out of time because of a four-year limitation.

“Augean believes this assessment to be without merit and we will appeal,” it adds.

The company says the nature of landfill and different materials can lead to differences in opinion on the applicable rate of landfill tax, and it had taken extensive legal and other advice over several years.

“Should HMRC make further such assessments, for this and one other subsidiary, the total amount that could potentially be claimed could be very large.

”Augean intends to work with stakeholders in the sector about the broader adverse implications for the continued and necessary proper treatment of hazardous waste. 

“The group will robustly challenge this landfill tax assessment and any other subsequent assessment it may receive from HMRC, through the tax tribunal system if appropriate.”

Andrew Bryce, who had previously been on the company’s board for over 10 years, is due to rejoin because of his experience of environmental law.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.