Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Cory Riverside to GLA: London facing waste capacity crisis

Cory Riverside chief executive Nicholas Pollard has warned that London is facing a “waste capacity crisis”, after Greater London Authority (GLA) deputy mayor for environment and energy Shirley Rodrigues said a planned expansion of the company’s energy-from-waste (EfW) capacity at Belvedere was not needed.

Cory is looking to build a second incinerator at its Riverside Energy Park, which would take in 655,000 tonnes a year of residual waste, if planning permission is granted.

But speaking to a local paper, Rodrigues said the company’s EfW expansion was “unnecessary”. This reiterates the mayor of London’s environment strategy, released in May last year, which said that “no new EfW capacity will be needed”.

Rodrigues said: “We don’t need another incinerator bringing waste into London to be burnt. There is no use for the heat, so it’s a bit of a redundant facility.”

Responding to her comments, Pollard said: “The situation is stark. London is facing a waste capacity crisis with over two million tonnes of non-recyclable waste being sent to landfill or shipped overseas, and even after the forecast substantial increase in recycling,

”London’s steady growth means that non-recyclable waste volumes are set to rise significantly and will require disposal.

“Londoners deserve the modern solutions we already see in Scandinavian countries, which have banned landfill altogether. They actively promote recycling rates that far outstrip the UK’s, and the black bin waste that cannot be recycled is turned into green energy and aggregate materials for the construction industry.”

Pollard also countered the claim that EfW has a detrimental effect on recycling rates.

“The London Borough of Bexley, where we currently operate, has one of the highest recycling rates of any London borough,” he said.

Defra has insisted for a number of years that the UK will have enough treatment options to deal with expected residual waste volumes. But the Environmental Services Association has consistently warned of an impending capacity gap.

A report by consultancy Tolvik found London and the south-east are in danger of running out of landfill space by 2025, meaning the regions’ planned capacity for EfW would need to be doubled in order to cope.

Tolvik’s most recent report also found that policies set out in Defra’s resource and waste strategy would still not close the capacity gap.

A final decision on Cory Riverside’s planning application is expected to be made in spring next year.

A spokesperson said: ”Following its assessment of Cory’s proposals, the Planning Inspectorate will make a recommendation to the secretary of state for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, who will make the final decision on whether to grant the project consent.”

Readers' comments (3)

  • It was never needed to start with.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • When Ken Livingstone was the Mayor of London he proposed and supported the “Proximity Principle”. We worked alongside the Mayor’s team to support this. The “PP” plans and supports the treatment of all forms of waste and recyclables close to the point of production. For dealing with residual waste locally and by use of river transport Cory should be awarded 5 stars and a gold accolade. If the “PP” was introduced properly followed waste streams could be directed to local facilities and even taxed for moving hundreds of miles around the country. West London’s waste travels by train to Avonmouth (Bristol). If such waste was treated locally more local waste could be diverted to Avonmouth to make up any shortfall. We need a national policy that encourages long lasting carbon saving outcomes. Could Shirley Rodrigues provide an illustration of where waste produced in the GLA area is now ending up? This would fully illustrate my point.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Peter Jones

    Here we are 15 years down the road after "Mass Balance-London" and there is still a lack of regionally based power and heat load mapping which can be matched to the availability of re-usable "scrap" carbon that is otherwise incapable of economic re-use via material recycling , composting or AD.
    No data will always = incoherency , lost chances and low productivity.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.