Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Councils call on banks to save Renewi’s Derby EfW

Derbyshire County Council and Derby City Council have formally asked the banks behind the delayed Sinfin waste processing and energy-from-waste (EfW) plant to intervene in order to save the project.

In a joint statement, the councils said they would terminate the contract with Resource Recovery Solutions (RRS), a partnership between Interserve and Renewi, if the banks did not take action.

The RRS facility includes a gasification facility, which was due to open in 2017 but has been beset by a series of technical problems.

The councils’ join statement said: “RRS has still not been able to resolve ongoing issues at the plant to allow it to pass the certified performance tests needed to bring it into full service.”

Sinfin is financially backed by the UK Green Infrastructure Platform and three international banks: Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and Shinsei Bank from Japan and Bayerische Landesbank from Germany.

The councils said it would still push to complete the facility if the contract with RRS is terminated.

Simon Spencer, deputy leader at Derbyshire County, said: “We’ve given RRS every opportunity to get the waste treatment centre up and running. But we cannot wait indefinitely, and the fact that the plant still has not passed certified performance tests is clearly of enormous concern to us.

“The contract gives specific rights to the funders to step into the project. So far they have not exercised their rights, but the time has come to formally give notice to them that they should step in.

“We don’t want to end our contract with RRS but, if the funders cannot find a robust way to push the project forward, then we will be left with little choice.”

Don McLure, Derby City strategic director of corporate resources, said: “We’ve been pushing RRS to resolve outstanding issues at the plant and pass certified performance tests but, unfortunately, the delays continue.

“We need a facility to give us certainty about the future cost of dealing with Derby and Derbyshire’s waste, and this is the best option to get the plant fully operational as soon as possible.”

Readers' comments (2)

  • Derby city council and Derbyshire County council finally do the math and work out that the so-called 'energy-from-waste' incinerator, will bankrupt them. Reduction, reuse, recycling & composting are cheaper than incineration, yet recycling must be dismantled, (and is being in Derby) to 'feed' the burner contracts, - 'calorific' and 'organic' values.
    Yet Derby city council admitted that at a council meeting that recycling was cheaper than the incinerator.
    https://derbyfoe.com/global-risks-finance-accounts-for-climate-change-pollution/

    Mass balance also reveals more energy, (& diesel and water etc) wasted inthe process, than the tiny amount of energy created

    Burning plastics is high-carbon, polluting and definitely NOT 'green infrastructure'
    https://derbyfoe.com/co2-from-plastics-biomass-incineration-wid-definition/

    Banks which fund such wrongly called 'renewables' are supporting the destruction of world resources and bankrupting future generations, along with the planet.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This all goes back to a time when Government wanted to get large construction companies involved in waste infrastructure to increase competition in the marketplace. Derby is between a rock and a hard place and I cannot see a way out after so many gasification failures. It may appear to work in theory, but not in economical practice. See: http://www.no-burn.org/wp-content/uploads/Waste-Gasification-and-Pyrolysis-high-risk-low-yield-processes-march-2017.pdf

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.