Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

County challenged over 'anti-competitive' EfW plant contract

Gloucestershire County Council has been referred to the Competition & Markets Authority in a bitter dispute about an energy recovery facility.

Objectors to the £500m Javelin Park plant argued that the private finance initiative contract between the council and developer Urbaser Balfour Beatty was open to challenge as being anti-competitive.

This followed Gloucestershire being ordered by the Information Tribunal on 14 March to publish most of the sections of the incinerator contract that it had argued were confidential.

Local community benefit society Community R4C said it had complained to the authority after a barrister’s analysis of the contract showed it could demonstrate value for money only by comparing incineration with landfill, rather than alternative disposal methods.

It claimed the contract’s pricing structure discouraged recycling and waste reduction, and would stifle competition and innovation among other waste companies.

The report said the project would cost Gloucestershire some £4.2m a year more than alternatives, and that termination costs were “much lower than previously stated by the council and could be covered by funds already committed”.

Community R4C’s joint founders Tom Jarman and Sue Oppenheimer said: “The council should request an immediate halt to construction to minimise liabilities while a full investigation takes place into both the legality of the contract and the value for money findings in this report.”

But Gloucestershire’s commissioning director for communities and infrastructure Nigel Riglar defended the contract processes.

He said: “The council ran a competitive process following procurement law to select a company to deal with of the county’s household waste that cannot be reduced, reused or recycled.

“We invited any company with any technology. R4C did not bid. The contract itself was originally written by central Government and is used widely in hundreds of contracts covering waste, health, roads and infrastructure. It is available on the council’s website.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • INdeed this is correct.

    The options exist to have a waste treatment plant that does not have any Gate Fee for treatment at all.

    This would save the Council Tax Payers £10 Million a year before accounting for benefits.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.