Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Defra chooses JTA’s 2018 WEEE compliance fee

electronic items

The Joint Trade Associations’ (JTA) method for setting the 2018 compliance fee for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) has been chosen by Defra over a rival proposal from Valpak.

Defra may impose a compliance fee methodology for schemes that fail to achieve their collection target, based on a method decided by ministers at the beginning of each year.

JTA and Valpak both put forward proposals to a Defra consultation in October 2018.

Under the JTA proposal, fees will be stream-specific. It said this would ensure that compliance scheme costs were “reflective of the cost to collect WEEE” by using the weighted average net cost per tonne of direct WEEE collections from local authorities.

A premium would reflect the extent to which schemes have collected WEEE from local authorities rather than “relying on lower-cost evidence from other sources”.

The JTA comprises nine trade associations, including the Association of Manufacturers of Domestic Appliances, Lighting Industry Association and TechUK.

It consulted compliance schemes ERP, Recolight and Repic when drafting the proposal.

Susanne Baker, JTA chair and head of environment and compliance at techUK, said: “The compliance fee has an important role to play in the UK WEEE system. We believe the improvements we have made to the 2018 methodology continue to uphold the principle that producer compliance schemes always see collection as the preferred route to compliance, with the fee being available as a less attractive, but necessary, safety valve.

“Importantly, today’s decision also provides consistency in the spending of the 2017 fund, and will help to ensure we can continue to build on the substantial work already underway – work aimed at driving future collections and supporting environmentally sound treatment and recovery.”

 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.