Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

EU urged to reject plastic exports change

Waste industry bodies have stepped up their campaign to try to persuade the EU to reject restrictions on the export of plastic waste.

The European Federation of Waste Management and Environmental Services (FEAD) has also called on global trade body the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) to oppose the move.

Signatories to the Basel Convention, which regulates the transboundary movements of hazardous waste and its disposal, last month agreed to reclassify most plastic waste as needing consent from receiving countries before it may be exported.

FEAD warned that that blocking exports would eventually damage the EU’s recycling performance because material that could no longer be exported would likely be incinerated or landfilled.

It has now issued a position paper in which it urged the EU and OECD to maintain the status quo and reject changes to the convention.

FEAD said: “The objective of the Basel Convention amendment is to combat maritime pollution caused by plastic littering. However, an automatic transfer of the rules foreseen in the updated convention to the OECD and EU levels would not contribute anything to solving the problem of ocean littering.

“In fact, constraining the free movement of mixed plastic wastes within these areas could jeopardise important progress made with regards to the effective treatment of plastics.”

It said Europe was at the forefront of technological progress in plastic waste recycling, and the continued free movement of non-hazardous plastic waste in the EU will ”ensure that waste is treated where it makes the most sense both economically, and from the perspective of environmental protection”.

 

Readers' comments (1)

  • FEAD's comments are amusing. The EU were leaders in promoting the amendments and are not about to reverse their own initiative. Further FEAD has a serious misconception that export for recycling is export for environmentally sound recycling. The plastics recycling myth has come home to roost -- its been a fraud all along. Only 9% of plastics have ever been exported and that 9% includes very dirty, polluting recycling abroad. And...only 1% of plastics have been recycled more than once. It is fraud.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.