Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Food waste statistics questioned

Environmental campaigners have urged MPs to back stricter food waste targets and regulations rather than relying solely on voluntary codes.

TV chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall and author Tristram Stuart criticised the Government’s “regressive” negotiating position on the EU circular economy (CE) package when they appeared before the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs committee (Efra) select committee.

Both were questioned as part of Efra’s ‘Food waste in England’ inquiry, and they praised WRAP’s voluntary Courtauld schemes for helping the UK to outperform many other countries in cutting food waste.

Fearnley-Whittingstall (pictured above) called WRAP’s research “ground-breaking”, but questioned the widely held belief that more than half of the UK’s food waste came from households, when such data was not available in other sectors such as retail, catering or manufacturing.

“We do not know how much food is being wasted in the supply chain and the field,” he said. “Transparency is the only way any other commitments, voluntary or mandatory, can be properly assessed.”

He praised Tesco and Sainsbury for voluntarily agreeing to publish their food waste statistics, and called for mandatory measures to be introduced so other retailers are made to produce similar reports.

Stuart said that even if most food was thrown away by householders, retailers encouraged over-buying by advertising two-for-one and similar offers.

Asked about a potential food waste reduction target, Stuart (pictured below) said he thought that a legally binding goal, like that in Scotland, would be good for England.

“To bind the Government to achieving a national target across the supply chain would drive innovation in the areas that are the biggest possible wins. We would stop going after minor sources of waste [just] because they are high profile and we would go after where the big levels of food waste really are.”

The European Commission’s CE package, currently under debate, includes no such binding food waste reduction target but calls on member states to “take measures” to halve food waste by 2030.

Stuart criticised the UK Government’s role in the removal of a mooted requirement for member states to reduce their food waste by 30% by 2025.

“I think an international target would be helpful. The UK had an instrumental hand in ensuring the CE package did not include mandatory targets for member states and that was a very regressive position to take.

“If we still have the opportunity to undo that damage, that would be a good thing.”

Tristram stuart

Tristram stuart

Readers' comments (1)

  • The Food Waste figures dramatically over-estimate the quantities as can be seen by the AD community bidding for the waste.

    Now we see the companies accepting that there is now no need for a Treatment Fee for the Organic Fraction of MSW and Food Waste to make their business cases profitable - and we see proposals being made in the UK and the wider EU for Waste Treatment offerings where the Treatment Fees or Gate fees are £zero per tonne how is it that the Waste Managers around the country are still opting for treatment plants that rely on such fees such as the waste to energy fraternity. Surely a place like Brighton and Hove/East Sussex (as an example) where they incinerate over 200,000 tonnes of waste per year could benefit from a cost reduction of at least £8 Million per year, or other places like Staffordshire, Sheffield, Belvedere, Kent, Liverpool, Ince, Manchester, Glasgow and in the wider European context Dublin or Amsterdam would equally benefit.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.