Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Greens claim incineration is blocking recycling


The spread of energy from waste (EfW) is damaging UK progress towards recycling targets, the Green Party has said.

In a report A Burning Issue; How Incineration is Stopping Recycling, the party said that incineration would overtake recycling as the main method of waste disposal during 2018-19, with landfill a distant third.

It said incineration already exceeds recycling volumes in London, the West Midlands and the north-east.

While the Government has committed to 50% recycling by 2020, this target would be unachievable, according to the Greens, without damage to the finances of the EfW industry

Baroness Jones, party representative in the House of Lords, said: “I find it shocking that the UK is on the verge of burning more waste than it recycles.

“The ban on recycled waste going to China has inevitably led to a UK pile-up, and that could bring forward the moment when our recycling gets treated as a fuel rather than a valuable resource.”

She said incineration should be a last resort option for waste that could not be recycled or reused, but instead there was “a market-driven system of incinerators which constantly need to be fed”.

Many of the councils that have signed up to long-term contracts with incinerators have recycling rates among the country’s worst, the report said.

The Greens called for action to encourage recycling including weekly food waste collections, recycling contracts that include plastic tubs, pots and trays, publishing the financial details of EfW contracts and a tax on incineration.

China’s ban on importing most recyclables “could see the tipping point between incineration and recycling reached this year, as material is burnt instead of being processed properly”, the report said.

It called for the UK to build infrastructure to recycle its own waste.

The Environmental Services Association recently launched its own report calling on the Government to back EfW.

The report, Energy for the Circular Economy: an Overview of Energy from Waste in the UK, said “simple policy interventions” could support the diversion of up to 60 million tonnes of waste from landfill in the next 10 years, saving 12 million tonnes of CO₂.

Defra reaction:

“We have made great progress in boosting household recycling rates, which have increased from 11% to over 45% between 2000 and 2016. More waste is being recycled than incinerated, and less waste is being sent to landfill.

“Our 25-year plan for the environment set out our commitment to leave the environment in a better state than we inherited it, and we’ll be setting out more detail on how we further increase our recycling rates in our forthcoming Resources and Waste Strategy.”



Readers' comments (4)

  • More like pollution from waste! Amazing that this is allowed at this pace in this country!
    We need a major overhaul of the system

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • EfW and recycling aren't alternatives, they complement each other. Recycle first, second, third and when the material eventually can't be recycled again, send it to energy recovery.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • There is no 'need' for incineration, which we used to do in the caves. The contracts sugned by local authorities prove that reduction, reuse & recycling have to end, to feed the tonnages of 'calorific' & 'organic' value.

    The carbon dioxide emissions, fromwhat is basically plastic-burning, are huge and there is no saving.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Contamination of material and lack of consumer education is what blocks recycling.

    Too much material is set aside by consumers for recycling that cannot be recycled or is contaminated by food waste which means that full or partial loads can and are rejected by Materials Recovery Facilities.

    Instead of blaming the use of Energy from Waste plants for recycling failures, why not address the education issue that is required to make consumers separate material effectively in the first place.

    If it is not in the residual (grey bin) waste stream in the first place then the so-called demand for EFW will reduce.

    Incidentally, remember that for the most part Councils will make money on recyclables collected at source... whereas EFW costs them money...

    Recent years have seen recovery plants close at high cost because the Council did not provide the right facilities and education to its residents to separate the material correctly at source.

    We should be making recycling easier, reducing the different types of plastics used, in turn making it easier for people to know what to put in their recycling and what not.

    So .. address the producers and source of plastics, and improve the education of residents.

    That will in turn reduce the so-called "demand" for EFW.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.