Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Javid calls in Veolia's Hertfordshire EfW scheme

2000 veolia hertfordshire

Veolia says it is shocked that the Government has ordered a public inquiry into plans for an energy-from-waste (EfW) facility in Hertfordshire.

Sajid Javid, secretary of state for housing, communities and local government, called in the plans following the department’s intervention in December, when the council was prevented from granting permission.

This is Veolia’s second attempt to build an EfW facility for Hertfordshire County Council. The Ratty’s Lane scheme in Hoddesdon, bitterly opposed by community groups and local MP Charles Walker, is itself an alternative to a previous project at New Barnfield. This was rejected in 2014 by the then communities secretary Sir Eric Pickles.

A Veolia spokesperson said the company was “shocked at the unexpected decision”.

“We cannot think of any basis for this on planning grounds because the application has already been approved locally by the appropriate authorities.

“The facility sits on an industrial site outside the Green Belt, will divert local waste from landfill and protect the environment. At the same time it will contribute significantly to the local economy by creating jobs and deliver green energy that will power tens of thousands of homes.

“This decision sends out a negative message to private companies looking to invest millions of pounds in much-needed infrastructure in the UK. We are considering all our options.”

Terry Hone, council cabinet member for waste management, said: “We are very disappointed. Planning in a county like Hertfordshire is always going to involve balancing different considerations but, as a waste disposal authority, we believe there is a compelling case for granting planning permission.

“Continuing delay to the scheme adds pressure to Hertfordshire’s bill for disposing of waste, although the project will still provide a very good value for money solution compared with other options. We hope the secretary of state will move swiftly in his deliberations which will ensure a further level of scrutiny to this very important project.”

Sajid Javid

Sajid Javid 2015

Javid will appoint a planning inspector to hold a public inquiry into Veolia’s proposals for the 350,000-tonne plant.

The inspector will recommend whether or not planning permission can be granted but the minister makes the final decision.

If the plans are rejected, the council faces paying Veolia a £1.2m break-up fee.

Readers' comments (1)

  • It seems as though the original outline proposal registered in 2006 for this projected programme has been rejected because of serious reservations about its tenure.

    From all accounts in the original discussions in Ware (Hertfordshire) in 2006 any potential then to offer a valued and more competitive approach using systems such as turning the residues as organic materials into renewable fuels at a fraction of the costs here were thrown out of the window regardless of the fact that these options would have generated over £80 Million per year in revenue stream for the area's Council Tax Payers and would not have needed a gate fee for treatment.
    Maybe the Minister will take note of this....although we understand that since this note will not be published he will not know.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Flattered to think the secretary for state decides what to do after reading an MRW article.

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.