Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Labour shadow resources minister backs anti-EfW campaign

Shadow resources minister David Drew has said a redrafted Labour policy on waste will have a “much more sceptical attitude” to energy-from-waste (EfW) because of its adverse impact on recycling rates.

This clashes with the industry view that EfW is an essential part of the UK’s waste management treatment options and that it should co-exist with recycling.

david drew 2

david drew 2

Drew, left, recently backed a report on incinerator emissions published by campaign group UK Without Incineration Network (UKWIN).

He told MRW the report was the “first of a number that we will be pursuing”.

“Labour is in the process of revising its waste policy which at the very least will have a much more sceptical attitude towards incineration as it is crowding out recycling,” he said.

“I will be producing a paper later in the year on this.”

A researcher for Drew, Ron Bailey, also worked on the UKWIN report.

Drew was one of three MPs from across the political divide to attend a UKWIN event to launch the report at the House of Lords on 17 July.

Shlomo Dowen, UKWIN national co-ordinator said he wanted to use the “the levers of democracy to make a difference”.

The report argued that information was supposed to be made public for PM10 and PM2.5 emissions where these reached one tonne a year, but that there was no commercially available equipment to do such continuous monitoring.

UKWIN said this meant emissions could exceed reporting thresholds without the public being told.

“We found out early on that clearly there is a direct relationship with the growth of incineration and the relative flat-lining of recycling.”

At the meeting, Drew said: “We came at this as an exercise to look at why there has been such little transparency in the process of how we dispose of our waste.

“We found out early on that clearly there is a direct relationship with the growth of incineration and the relative flat-lining of recycling… There are aspects of the pollutants that are either glibly batted away or more particularly are ignored.

“We have met with the EA… no one has yet been able to prove in any way that what we have said is wrong.”

Bim Afolami, Conservative MP for Hitchen and Harpenden said: “The reason I am concerned about it is that there is a proposal just outside my constituency, yards over the border, for a large incinerator. And since then, as you can imagine, people have been very concerned.”

But Afolami also questioned how residual waste should be dealt with as “landfill has its own problems”.

A report by the Green Party launched in the same week as the UKWIN event also called for a moratorium on building new EfW facilities, over concerns that EfW is blocking recycling rates.

Jacob Hayler, ESA executive director, said: “It is simply wrong to suggest that EfW crowds out recycling, as can easily be seen by looking across many of our EU partners where high levels of recycling happily co-exist with the use of EfW to treat non-recyclable wastes.

“In the same vein, some of the highest performing recycling counties in England have also adopted EfW solutions.

“The issue is not that EfW crowds out recycling. On the contrary, EfW crowds out landfill, which is the alternative option for managing residual waste.”

Hayler said the Government’s forthcoming resources and waste strategy should include policies to separate as much recyclable material from the waste stream as possible.

He added: “But EfW remains the best alternative for the non-recyclable remainder, both in terms of investment in local communities and environmentally.”

Readers' comments (4)

  • This is the start of a campaign to bring in an incineration tax.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Incinerator are an idiotic way of dealing with waste. It makes short term profits for operators and destroys the environment

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • An incineration tax is a good idea.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where is there leadership? It appears to be lacking from Government and whatever is proposed is rubbished by others for political purposes. Lock all these people in a room and don’t let them out until a consensus is reached. The same with Brexit. Increased taxes on our industry will lead to more bulk commercial fly tipping. In 2008 it was sustainability that counted number 1. In 2018 Government does not want to take the initial cost of true sustainability after 10 years of, what has been effectively, time wasting. The industry is treated as a football and just kicked around whilst lobbyists pull in every opposite direction.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.