Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Paper quality call for local authorities

Councils have been warned to improve the quality of mixed papers collected for recycling or face falling revenues and other effects as China continues to crack down on waste imports.

Chinese customs authorities said earlier this year that they would be “severely cracking down on all illegal activities with regards to foreign waste”.

The move forms part of the National Sword policy, seen as a successor to 2013’s Operation Green Fence, in which tens of thousands of containers were rejected at ports.

President of the Beijing-based China Scrap Plastics Association recently warned that China could block imports of all recycled plastic within a decade.

Now attention has turned to paper, with Recycling Association chief executive Simon Ellin saying strict inspection regimes and tightening standards could squeeze the volume of certain grades let in to the country.

“The move to 100% inspection of recyclable material has happened in China,” Ellin told MRW. “They look through every container and rigorously apply their GB national standard, which means a maximum of 1.5% of material can be non-target, for example plastic within a paper batch.”

There have been persistent industry concerns that China could eventually ban certain grades of waste paper, but Ellin believes a tightening of the national standard to permit only 1% contamination of paper loads is more likely.

He added: “Overall we are going to see less volume of mixed paper going from the UK to China – that’s already happened because people are nervous about supplying it unless they are confident of the quality.”

Having a single container of substandard material rejected can cost $3,000 (£2,300) in quarantine, handling and shipping charges, according to Ellin, roughly the same amount the material is worth if sold.

“There has been a switch by some bigger producers to sending material to Europe because it feels safer,” he added.

All this has had an effect on prices. One tonne of mixed fibres for export was worth as little as £45 in early June, according to MRW’s indexes, compared with a minimum of £95 in mid-March.

“It is a buyer’s market,” says Ellin. “It means we have got to make continuous improvements in quality.

“Councils have to get their communications right with the public, and look at their contracts with waste management firms, to make sure they get the right material going into bins. Then they have a chance.”

A two-tier mixed paper market could even open up.

Readers' comments (1)

  • Yet again more moans.

    Deal with this in the UK and make money from it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.