Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Prison warning to directors over compensation award

Directors of a skip hire company face further spells in prison unless they pay Natural Resources Wales (NRW) nearly £300,000 under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

Patricia Gaffey, Joseph Gaffey and Michael Gaffey, directors of Porthmadog Skip Hire, were each sentenced to 10 months in prison in March 2017 for illegally storing waste and breaching the terms of their environmental permit.

Now they have been told by Mold Crown Court to pay £292,000 as compensation to NRW for running a waste operation illegally, based on their personal; assets and the potential value at auction of the company’s assets.

They have three months in which to pay and could be returned to prison if they fail to do so. The court ruled that the trio’s total criminal benefit from their offences was £1,521,304, which means NRW can apply for further compensation if more of their assets come to light

The £292,000 will be use by NRW to partly repay a £347,000 award by the Welsh Government to clear the site at Penamser Industrial Estate, Porthmadog.

NRW executive director of operations for north and mid-Wales Tim Jones said: “We don’t want to take companies to court. We would much rather work with them so they operate legally without harming the environment.

“That’s what we did with this company but they failed to take our advice and, in the end, we had no choice but to take the matter to court.”

Jones said it was important that taxpayers did not have to pay to clean up such sites, which posed a risk to people and wildlife.

NRW has released video footage shot from one of its drones flying over the company’s yard.


Readers' comments (2)

  • If their assets exceed the clean up costs then they should pay for all the costs associated. If their assets do not meet all these costs then all their assets must be used to fufill these obligations.

    Why not sell their houses and cars etc. as well?

    For too long to little attention has been made to redress these issues. This country is soft-peddling the issues here.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They should be stripped of all their assets.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.