Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Tighter recycling contamination level costs councils

use collection crews to boost recycling

One in five councils has been hit by rising costs to its recycling services during the past year because of China’s waste import restrictions, a survey by the Local Government Association (LGA) has found. 

The report revealed that councils which have been most affected have seen their recycling costs increase by £500,000 on average in the past year.

The loss in earnings is in line with previous warnings by the LGA.

Associated restrictions on exports to Vietnam and Malaysia could lead to further rises in costs for UK councils. Thailand has also outlined plans for a ban on waste imports.

The report said MRF gate fees had increased on average from £15 to £22 per tonne in a year, in part due to stricter contamination demands on exports.

The LGA reiterated calls for manufacturers to contribute more to the cost of recycling and reduce the use of hard-to-recycle materials such as black plastic trays.

Martin Tett, LGA environment spokesman, said: “It is clear that the ban by China on imported waste, which could soon be implemented in other countries, could have a marked impact on councils’ ability to recycle.

“It is essential that the Government takes the opportunities of the upcoming Budget and publication of its resources and waste strategy to assess the financial impact of these bans on councils thoroughly, and encourage manufacturers to take up more of the responsibility for dealing with these unrecyclable materials.”

Readers' comments (1)

  • Reduce hard-to-recycle materials such as black plastic trays is a fair expectation. However, asking manufacturers to contribute more is not going to solve the problem.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.