Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Use collection crews to boost recycling

In the face of diminishing council budg­ets and stagnating recycling rates, it would be easy to despair and wonder how on earth local authorities can influ­ence recycling capture without being able to afford significant service changes.

In my experience, a spike in commu­nications activity associated with major service change always coincides with a spike in recycling capture. But this can quickly return to ‘normal’ without regular repetition of the message – sup­ported by a large communication budget and team of enthusiastic officers pounding the streets.

While little can directly replace these longed-for resources, there are still ways to deliver improvements with a meagre budget. The key is to understand what data or information is available to you and how it can be used to deliver improvements.

Collection crews, for example, are often an under-utilised resource when it comes to information. Suez recently reviewed the recorded reasons why certain households’ recycling had not been collected by the crews working under one of our municipal contracts. The research showed that 50% of the incidents were due to bags that were intended for source-segregated recy­cling being filled with commingled recy­clables including glass and metals.

Sorting out the bags and separating the material dramatically slows down the crews, exposes them to potential health and safety issues and, ultimately, disengages residents who have tried to recycle but not quite got it right.

In response to this, we developed a ‘toolbox talk’ (see box) to ensure the cor­rect information was given to house­holders and that a consistent, objective, approach was applied by our crews when dealing with these circumstances. This meant that minor offences were always sorted and collected and that, in the case of significant commingling, it was clearly explained to residents why we could not collect the material.

This relatively inexpensive action resulted in a 42% reduction in incidents where recycling could not be collected and a 71% reduction in the number of bags being reported by frustrated resi­dents as ‘missed collections’ – both of which were observed and monitored on the ground as well as by crew reports and statistical analysis.

This benefited the service by increas­ing the capture of material from these properties rather than it being left at the kerbside and potentially entering the residual waste stream.

Even though this may not provide a benefit on the scale of a major service change or well-financed communica­tions campaign, with careful monitor­ing it demonstrates a tangible positive impact which can be replicated in other areas. For example, a similar approach could also be applied to tackling con­tamination and overflowing bins.

So my advice to local authorities looking for quick and cheap perfor­mance gains would be to check their reporting sheets and look beneath the surface to see what story they tell.

TOOLBOX TALK   

It is essential to fully engage collection crews in the targets to boost recycling rather than simply issue instructions. Suez used an informal ‘toolbox talk’, which included:  

  • Explaining the purpose of the talk and how the subject affects householders, our local authority partner/client and the high service standards we expect.  
  • Sharing the data collected from crew information sheets and wider monitoring across the service in order to identify areas that can be improved.  
  • Providing photographs of acceptable and unacceptable containers as an objective measure when evaluating contamination, while encouraging discussion to gather feedback on an individual’s experiences.  
  • Reminding crews of their responsibilities regarding communicating with residents when containers are assessed to be unacceptable, approaching the conversation from a customer’s perspective.  
  • Following up so everyone can see if their efforts have achieved the result.

 Sarah Ottaway is municipal recycling manager for Suez

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions. Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.