Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of MRW, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Report this comment to a moderator

Please fill in the form below if you think a comment is unsuitable. Your comments will be sent to our moderator for review.
By submitting your information you agree to our Privacy & Cookie Policy.

Report comment to moderator

Required fields.

Headline

Waste firms write to ministers over landfill tax changes

Comment

Does the Defra spokesperson know what trommel fines are? This is not a duty of care issue but an interpretation of landfill tax legislation that discriminates against all sites regardless of the quality of the trommel fines. For example, trommeling soil and stone to remove the stone would mean that even if the resultant soil was inert it would have to be subject to the higher rate tax if disposed of to landfill. The same material from the site of production would attract the lower rate because it hasn't been through a transfer station. The two regimes do not match up and it is about time Defra and HMRC stopped passing the buck and agreed on definitions that are common to both.

Posted date

25 May, 2012

Posted time

5:38 pm

required
required
required
required